Oksana Denysiuk
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-0647
Nataliia Tytarenko
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5837-393X
Tetiana Dron
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-5610
EDUCATIONAL INDICATORS OF TEACHING STAFF PROVISION LEVEL DURING TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES: INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL CONTEXTS
Full text (pdf)
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract. The article analyses the ongoing transformation processes in the education sector, both internationally and domestically, within the context of the European educational space. It has been determined that these processes are based on the key competencies that teachers should develop in their students. These competencies include literacy, multilingualism, scientific and engineering skills, digital and technological competencies, interpersonal skills, the ability to acquire new knowledge, active citizenship, entrepreneurship, and cultural awareness. The sources of educational indicators are considered, including PISA studies, Eurostat, OECD educational indicators, and national educational indicator systems. This article examines the implementation of the New Ukrainian School (NUS) reform in relation to teacher provision. It discusses the PISA study, which provides data on the quality of education by assessing pupils’ ability to apply the knowledge, competencies, and skills acquired in educational institutions in everyday life. The results of this international comparative study can inform governments’ educational policies and management decisions based on evidence-based statistics. The authors analysed the implementation of the NUS reform in the educational sector, focusing on domestic transformations. The aim of the reform is to provide teachers with the necessary tools to improve their professional level, self-motivation, and develop new competences. The study compared OECD indicators with national education indicators, including teachers leaving the profession, pupil-teacher ratio, and class size.
Keywords: general secondary education, indicator, pedagogical staff, reform, transformation.
https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2024-1-60-71
Keywords: general secondary education, indicator, pedagogical staff, reform, transformation.
https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2024-1-60-71
References:
1. Liashenko, O. (2004). Quality strategy as a basis of educational policy in the world. Monitoring the quality of education: world achievements and Ukrainian prospects. Kyiv: K.I.S. [in Ukrainian].
2. Lokshyna, O. (2017). Reforms to extend the duration of school education in the EU: from the experience of implementation. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 3, 43-53. Retrieved from https://uej.undip.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/546/476 [in Ukrainian].
3. Lokshyna, O., Hlushko, O., Dzhurylo, A., Kravchenko, C., Nikolska, N., Tymenko, M., & Shparyk, O. (2021). Trends in the development of school education in the EU, USA and China. Kyiv: TOV “KONVI PRINT”. Retrieved from https://undip.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/21-13.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. Dzhurylo, A., Hlushko, O., Lokshyna, O., Mariuts, I., Tymenko, M., & Shparyk, O. (2018). Transformation processes in school education in the European Union and the United States. Kyiv: TOV “KONVI PRINT”. Retrieved from https://undip.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/transform_prochecu_2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Glushko, О. (2016). Basic definitions of the problem of transformation in education: view of Ukrainian scientists. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Pedagogy, 2(4), 10-13. Retrieved from https://pedvisnyk.knu.ua/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/44 [in Ukrainian].
6. Eurostat. (n. d.). Welcome to Eurostat. The home of high-quality statistics and data on Europe. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/home.
7. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (n. d.). PISA. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/pisa [in Ukrainian].
8. Hryshchenko, M. (Ed.). (2016). New Ukrainian School. Conceptual framework for secondary school reform. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en.
10. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2016). On the approval and implementation of the list of national educational indicators of efficiency and quality of general secondary education and the methodology for their calculation (Order No. 1116, September 19). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1116729-16#Text [in Ukrainian].
11. Denysiuk, О., Dron, Т., & Tytarenko, N. (2022). Monitoring study on the provision of pedagogical staff with the implementation of the NUS reform. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/teaching-staff_2022.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Denysiuk, О., Dron, Т., & Tytarenko, N. (2023). Monitoring study on the readiness of teachers to implement the New Ukrainian School. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/teaching-staff_2023.pdf [in Ukrainian].
13. The Economist Intelligence Limited. (2020). Future-Ready Teaching. Nurturing tomorrow’s educators. Retrieved from https://edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/Microsoft-Staff-2030-Infographic.pdf.
2. Lokshyna, O. (2017). Reforms to extend the duration of school education in the EU: from the experience of implementation. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 3, 43-53. Retrieved from https://uej.undip.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/546/476 [in Ukrainian].
3. Lokshyna, O., Hlushko, O., Dzhurylo, A., Kravchenko, C., Nikolska, N., Tymenko, M., & Shparyk, O. (2021). Trends in the development of school education in the EU, USA and China. Kyiv: TOV “KONVI PRINT”. Retrieved from https://undip.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/21-13.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. Dzhurylo, A., Hlushko, O., Lokshyna, O., Mariuts, I., Tymenko, M., & Shparyk, O. (2018). Transformation processes in school education in the European Union and the United States. Kyiv: TOV “KONVI PRINT”. Retrieved from https://undip.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/transform_prochecu_2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Glushko, О. (2016). Basic definitions of the problem of transformation in education: view of Ukrainian scientists. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Pedagogy, 2(4), 10-13. Retrieved from https://pedvisnyk.knu.ua/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/44 [in Ukrainian].
6. Eurostat. (n. d.). Welcome to Eurostat. The home of high-quality statistics and data on Europe. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/home.
7. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (n. d.). PISA. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/pisa [in Ukrainian].
8. Hryshchenko, M. (Ed.). (2016). New Ukrainian School. Conceptual framework for secondary school reform. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en.
10. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2016). On the approval and implementation of the list of national educational indicators of efficiency and quality of general secondary education and the methodology for their calculation (Order No. 1116, September 19). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1116729-16#Text [in Ukrainian].
11. Denysiuk, О., Dron, Т., & Tytarenko, N. (2022). Monitoring study on the provision of pedagogical staff with the implementation of the NUS reform. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/teaching-staff_2022.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Denysiuk, О., Dron, Т., & Tytarenko, N. (2023). Monitoring study on the readiness of teachers to implement the New Ukrainian School. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/teaching-staff_2023.pdf [in Ukrainian].
13. The Economist Intelligence Limited. (2020). Future-Ready Teaching. Nurturing tomorrow’s educators. Retrieved from https://edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/Microsoft-Staff-2030-Infographic.pdf.