INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL SPACE
1’2026

Andrii Lytvynchuk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-558X
Nataliia Pron
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9413-8793
Tetiana Dron
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-5610

INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATION STATISTICS: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND CURRENT PRACTICES

Full text (pdf)
Language: English
Abstract. The increasing role of data in education governance emphasises the importance of the development of education statistics as a key instrument for the information support of education policy. The study aims to generalise international experience in the field of education statistics and to analyse its functioning in the contemporary context as a multi-level institutional system of education data governance. The article analyses the organi­sational structure of the international system of education statistics, distinguishing global, regional (in particular the EU), and national levels, identifies the roles of key actors, including the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and Eurostat, and pays particular attention to coordination mechanisms, primarily the joint UOE (UNESCO–OECD–Eurostat) data collection, which ensures the comparability and consistency of statistical information across countries. The significance of the Eurydice analytical and information network in the formation of comparative and up-to-date information on European education systems is also examined. It is shown that Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) act as key integrative components of national education data systems, ensuring the linkage between processes of data collection, harmo­nisation, and analytical use. A comparative analysis of selected countries demonstrates the diversity of EMIS architecture and data governance models, reflecting differences in national approaches to the organisation of education data. The main trends in the develop­ment of education statistics are identified, including digitalisation, the integration of different data sources, and the increasing role of analytical tools. At the same time, key challenges related to interoperability, analytical capacity, and the effective use of data in decision-making processes are outlined. Promising directions for further research include approaches related to the transition towards integrated cross-sectoral data ecosystems, in particular through the integration of education data with the fields of health, the labour market, and social policy, which creates opportunities for a comprehensive analysis of human capital development.
Keywords: education statistics, education data, education management information system (EMIS), data governance, international system of education statistics, evidence-based policy­making.
https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2026-1-5-23

References:
1. Koenen, E., Schwarzenegger, C. & Kittler, J. (2021). Data(fication): “Understanding the World Through Data” as an Everlasting Revolution. In Digital Roots: Historicizing Media and Communication Concepts of the Digital Age (pp. 137-156). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110740202-008.
2. OECD (2019). The Path to Becoming a Data-Driven Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/059814a7-en.
3. Fobia, A. C., Holzberg, J., Eggleston, C., Childs, J. H., Marlar, J., & Morales, G. (2019). Attitudes towards Data Linkage for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(S1), 264-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz008.
4. Tebrake, J. (2026). The future of international macroeconomic statistical standards: Toward a coordinated and adaptive research agenda. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 42(1), 113-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18747655261419930.
5. Jacobsson, S., & Oskarsson, C. (1995). Educational statistics as an indicator of technological activity. Research Policy, 24(1), 127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00753-G.
6. Londar, S., & Horna, M. (2021). Education statistics and monitoring tools for achieving the 4st goal of sustainable development. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 2(13), 5-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2021-2-5-19 [in Ukrainian].
7. Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2019). Objectivity as standardization in data-scientific education policy, technology and governance. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 64-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1556215.
8. Anderson, E. R., & Colyvas, J. A. (2021). What Sticks and Why? A MoRe Institutional Framework for Education Research. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 123(7), 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300705.
9. Elfert, M., & Ydesen, C. (2023). UNESCO, the OECD and the World Bank: A Global Governance Perspective. In Global Governance of Education. Educational Governance Research, 24. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40411-5_2.
10. Vaccari, V., & Gardinier, M. P. (2019). Toward one world or many? A comparative analysis of OECD and UNESCO global education policy documents. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 11(1), 68-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.11.1.05.
11. Voznyuk, L. (2025). Influence of state educational policy on the development and management of educational institutions. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, 1(1), 87-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-698X-2025-1-10 [in Ukrainian].
12. Husak, O., Shkabko, S., Lytvynchuk, A., & Pron, N. (2025). Harmonising Ukrainian education policy with European standards: The role of the Eurydice network. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 4(36), 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2025-4-5-15.
13. Tkachenko, V. (2025). Harmonization of international classifications in statistics on preschool education in Ukraine: review and analysis of compliance. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 4(36), 83-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2025-4-83-95 [in Ukrainian].
14. Lyesnikova, M. V. (2025). Comparative analysis of educational statistics in the field of professional pre-higher education in the European Union countries and Ukraine. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 3(35), 82-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2025-3-82-93 [in Ukrainian].
15. Asio, J. M. R., Leva, E. F., Lucero, L. C., & Cabrera, W. C. (2022). Education Management Information System (EMIS) and Its Implications to Educational Policy: A Mini-Review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(8), 1389-1398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.08.01.
16. UNESCO-UIS. (2020). Operational guide to using EMIS to monitor SDG 4. Retrieved from https://emis.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/09/EMIS-Operational-Guide-EN-WEB.pdf.
17. UNICEF. (2023). Education management information system in Europe and Central Asia: In-depth review of 13 countries. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/eca/media/28136/file/Education%20management%20information%20system%20in%20Europe%20and%20Central%20Asia.pdf.
18. Tereshchenko, H., Kyrianov, A., & Solohub, Ya. (2025). Methodology and tools of systems analysis as a basis for the development of national education management information systems. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 5(37), 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2025-5-47-58 [in Ukrainian].
19. Lytvynchuk, A., Kyrianov, A., & Irynevych, J. (2020). Purpose and directions of modernization of the hardware-software complex “Automated information complex of educational management”. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 4(11), 102-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2020-4-102-112 [in Ukrainian].
20. Puhachova, M. V. (2021). Registers of the education system in European countries: useful practices for Ukraine. Statistics of Ukraine, 92(1), 58-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(92)2021.01.06 [in Ukrainian].
21. UNESCO-UIS. (n. d.). UIS database. Retrieved from https://www.uis.unesco.org/en.
22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n. d.). About the OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/.
23. Eurostat. (n. d.). Welcome to Eurostat. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
24. Eurostat. (2025). UNESCO OECD Eurostat (UOE) joint data collection – methodology. Retrieved from https://surl.li/bwkqlc.
25. European Commission. (n. d.). Eurydice. Retrieved https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/.
26. Eurydice. (n. d.). National Education Systems. Retrieved from https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia.
27. Lytvynchuk, A., Tereshchenko, H., Anisimova, O., & Kyrianov A. (2023). Automated gathering and visualization of targeted educational subvention data as part of the digital transformation of education governance. Educational Analytics of Ukraine, 5(26), 47-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2023-5-47-63 [in Ukrainian].
28. International Development Research Centre. (2024). Education data systems and data use: A research synthesis. Retrieved from https://www.gpekix.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/Data%20Research%20Synthesis%20EN%20Final.pdf.
29. OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en.
30. Forrester, V. V. (2019). School management information systems: Challenges to educational decision-making in the big data era. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 8(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2019.8101.
31. El Mazbouh, M., Shah, R., & Lee, K. (2025). If evidence matters, why does the data die? Implementing education management information systems (EMIS) in development contexts. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1616717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1616717.
32. Kaindaneh, S., Kadt, Ju., Bechange, S., Jolley, E., Smart, N., & Schmidt, E. (2024). An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100399.